Analyzing The Wind :: essays research papers

Analyzing the Wind Inherit the Wind, by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee Plot: †¢ Cates is thrown into jail for teaching the beginning of the world contrary to what the bible says. †¢ Brady is coming to Hillsboro for the trail. †¢ Hornbeck announces he will bring Drummond to defend Cates. †¢ Both sides choose the remaining members of the jury. †¢ Cates almost pulls out but doesn’t. †¢ Howard is called to testify. †¢ Rachel is called to testify and the end of Brady’s questioning emotionally destroys her. So Cates doesn’t let Drummond question her, loosing a big part of the case. †¢ The judge rejects all of Drummond’s â€Å"witnesses.† †¢ Drummond calls Brady to testimony about the bible. †¢ Drummond uses the bible and Brady’s testimony on is favor and turns many followers at least less biased. †¢ The court found Cates guilty and sentenced to a hundred dollars fine †¢ Drummond wanted to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. †¢ Brady while giving a speech to get his followers back died. †¢ Drummond took both the theory of evolution and the bible home. Characters: Drummond: Supposed atheist, defendant lawyer and friend of Matthew Brady. Brady: Religious leader, â€Å"lawyer† against Cates and presidential candidate. Cates: Schoolteacher accused of teaching the theory of evolution, Rachel’s boyfriend and believed the church had some wrong thoughts about some things. Hornbeck: Cynical reporter, paid all the expenses of the defendant, hated ignorance, hence he hated Hillsboro. Setting: Hillsboro, around summer of 1925, July to be exact. Conflict: The main character’s difficulties were mainly each other, or the way they saw the world. Drummond’s greatest difficulty is to open people’s minds about everything. Brady’s difficulty was to prove God or the bible right against such a powerful speaker, as was Drummond. And Cates’ conflict is to prove to everybody he has not done wrong by teaching the theory of evolution. Point of View: It is a play, so there is no point of view. Or there’s everybody’s point of view. Themes: †¢ One should always keep an open mind to new ideas, no matter how absurd they may sound. (Drummond says it all the way through the book). †¢ People with different point of views may be thinking in the parallel but seem to differ. (The bible tells the story of the beginning of the world not in the same way as Darwin’s’ Theory of Evolution does. That doesn’t mean one of them is incorrect, simply, the story is told from different points of view. The Theory of Evolution is a fact book.

Look at George and Lennie’s dream Essay

Look at George and Lennie’s dream. Do you think that the dream had any chance of coming true? What made it likely that the dream would fail? From the very beginning ‘Of Mice and Men’, George and Lennie have their hopes set on ‘the dream’. They dream about getting a ranch together in the country. Lennie gets extremely fascinated and excited, as soon as animals are mentioned. He has learnt his trigger speech, word-for-word. He talks about all of the animals he will care for, and how he will feed them: â€Å"†¦a place for alfalfa, an’ that alfalfa is for the rabbits, an’ I take the sack and get it all fulla alfalfa and then I take it to the rabbits†. Lennie is so enthralled, and has thought and talked about the dream so much, that his speech was perfect, and was automatic as soon as he heard any mention of a dream or the animals, especially rabbits. The dream would likely fail, as the story received the title from an earlier poem by Robert Burns, â€Å"The Best Laid Plans Of Mice and Men†. This title portrays the idea, that no matter how planned an idea or a dream is, the outcome, sometimes tragic or not what we expect, has already been decided. John Steinbeck wrote the story in 1937. The story is centred in a place called Salinas. We know this, since the Salinas River is mentioned in the first line of the story. George Milton, described as a â€Å"smart little guy† by Slim, later demonstrates that intelligence without other values is worth nothing. Steinbeck made George in this way, to portray the idea that in almost all walks of life, there will always be natural leaders, and that people emerging with authority, will be an imminent action. Lennie is described as †jes’ like a kid†. Lennie may be child-minded, but is clearly observed as being â€Å"so strong†. He is simple-minded, and is unable to control his own body and strength. This explains why he is unable to understand why the animals he possesses, all die. His strength overpowers their fragility. There is a perfect description of the two men: â€Å"Both men were dressed in denim trousers, and in denim coats with brass buttons. Both wore black, shapeless hats and both carried tight blanket rolls slung over their shoulders†. George and Lennie are identically dressed. This portrays the ‘id’ and the ‘ego’ theme behind the novel. Although they are a perfect carbon copy of each other, stronger impact is created as we see the personality differences between the two, become more prominent as the story progresses. Lennie contains the ‘id’, also known as the desire, to do what he wants to do. George is different, as he contains the ‘id’ and ‘ego’ personality. He has the knowledge, the ego, to know whether his id is right or wrong. At the start of the novel, the two men are in a place called Weed. They are forced to leave there, when they are being hunted down. This is because Lennie had clutched the dress of a girl, and would cease to let go. The girl shouted rape, and so if they were to live, they must leave, and seek life in another location. Lennie was more enthralled and fascinated at listening to George tell him about the dream, and what they would own and how they would do things, rather than actually thinking about all of the things happening in reality. He knew what the dream was exactly, but he was more excited, when George told him: â€Å"Why’n’t you do it yourself. You know all of it. / No †¦ you tell it. It ain’t the same if I tell it. Go on †¦ George. How I get to tend the rabbits†. The story in the novel is based around the ‘American Dream’. That is the dream in which every man could strive for in the great country. The dream of all the ranch-hands was stability and eventually a place of their own. This place offered a hand of friendship and companionship, that Candy and Crooks along with George and Lennie all craved. The dream offered security, and equality, as well as an end to social injustice. This for some, was impossible to attain. For George and Lennie, the dream could be seen as ‘wishful thinking’. The dream is simply wanting to re-create happier times as a child, when George said they would have pigeons: â€Å"An’ we’d keep a few pigeons to go flyin’ around the win’mill like they done when I was a kid†. He wants to keep the good memories from his childhood alive, by re-enacting them. They also dream of paradise, with lots of different foods. They will either eat the animals they raise, or will hunt for their food: â€Å"†¦an’ when we kill a pig we can smoke the bacon and the hams, and make sausage an’ all like that. An’ when the salmon run up river we could catch a hundred of them. We could have them for breakfast†. They also thought about the authority and the power that they would now have, instead of having to confirm to the power of others: â€Å"If we don’t like a guy we can say: ‘Get the hell out,’ and by God he’s got to do it†. For once in their lives, they would be able to appreciate the needs of human beings. They would have their own home, and friends could stay: â€Å"An’ if a fren’ come along, why we’d have an extra bunk, an’ we’d say ‘Why don’t you spen’ the night,’ an’ by God he would†. Lennie talks about the dream in front of Candy, and Candy becomes very interested. Candy is old, and lonely. He is lonely as his dog, which suffered from rheumatism and old age was laid to rest, and Candy wishes the same of him, as he feels exactly the same, as his dog must have felt. He lost his hand on the ranch, and so he was given the job of swamping. Candy was given two hundred and fifty dollars for his injury, and the money may actually bring George and Lennie’s dream as close to reality as it has been so far. â€Å"An’ they give me two hundred an’ fifty dollars ’cause I los’ my hand. An’ I got fifty more saved up right in the bank, right now†. Candy is prepared to offer up the money, but he makes it perfectly clear that he wouldn’t ‘own’ the ranch, just because he had the highest stake. He is quite prepared to live away from that ranch, he has spent so long at.

The Rocking Horse Winner vs the Destructor

â€Å"The Rocking Horse Winner† by DH Lawrence and â€Å"The Destructors† by Graham Greene were both written post wars where poverty was abundant. These two fiction stories are written about the evil caused by materialism. Comparing the two short stories, we find that greed causes destruction. In both stories, the protagonist is a boy not yet grown. Lawrence creates a boy, Paul, who strives to change the luck of not only himself, but that of his entire family. Greene tells of a boy, T, who leads a gang into destructing the home of a wealthy man just because it still stands where others around it were destroyed by bombs from the war. This leads to the obvious contrast that one boy is attempting the acquisition of material goods while the other is attempting the destruction of material goods. Still it remains that in both cases, greed causes destruction of great value. Similarly in both stories, the boy’s mothers could be seen as the antagonist because they both are very materialistic and impress on the children the need to be seen as better than others. Lawrence describes Paul’s mother, â€Å"felt themselves superior to anyone in their neighborhood† and Greene describes T’s mother, â€Å"considered herself better than the neighbors†. The Rocking Horse Winner† is set in London soon after World War I. â€Å"The Destructor† was set after World War II in a place where just about everything had been destroyed by bombs. Both stories are told in the third person narrative. And both stories end up with the same theme: greed and materialism. â€Å"The Rocking Horse Winnerâ €  begins by describing Paul’s mother, â€Å" There was a woman who was beautiful, who started with all the advantages, yet she had no luck. † She obviously became a very bitter and jealous person unable to love even her children. Because of her greed and belief that more money was always needed, the house became haunted and was constantly chanting, â€Å"There must be more money. † In this story the house was symbolic of people’s greed and never ending desire to always have more. Paul is lead to believe that only luck can bring enough money into the old house so he sets out to find his own luck. He finds that luck by frantically riding a toy rocking horse that â€Å"takes him there† at which point he discovers the name of the horse that will win the next big race. Over time, Paul does make a lot of money gambling, but at the cost of his own life in the end. In â€Å"The Destructors†, a group of teenage boys decide to destroy the beautiful house that sat alone in the middle of a bombsite. The house was symbolic of all they, and most of the town, had lost to the war. The owner of the house had always been kind to the boys, but T didn’t trust anyone or their motives. After destroying the house, he told Mr. Thomas â€Å"There’s nothing personal. † Although the gang destroyed everything Mr. Thomas had and burnt his life’s savings, they took care to make sure Mr. Thomas was not in the house and was not hurt. So in the end, all his material belongings were gone, but he still had his life. The plot of both stories was about greed and resentment; Paul’s mothers greed for more and more and never being satisfied and T’s greed of making sure Mr. Thomas had no more than anyone else. The complication found in â€Å"The Rocking Horse Winner† was found in Paul having to frantically ride the horse at the cost of his own health in order to find the name of the next winner. In Destructors, the complication was the time it took to destroy the old house from the inside out without anyone noticing before Mr. Thomas returned from his trip. In each case, the denouement was the destruction that occurred because of greed. For Paul, no matter how lucky he was and no matter how much money he made, he never acquired what meant most to him, his mother’s love. In the end, Paul gained money and could have purchased material things, but lost his life. And in Greene’s story, even though T destroyed the home and all it’s beauty, he saved the life of Mr. Thomas. So in this case, all material things were lost, but the life was saved. These stories are in some ways very different, but both come to the same conclusion – greed destroys. Greed is like Satan, it takes and takes but is never satisfied with what it has, it always wants more. Greed only leads to destruction.

Media Deprivation Report

Nghia Le MCOM 1307 Mrs. Krissy Mailman 23 October 2012 Media Deprivation Report I just found out that I am addicted to the Internet and cell phone since I finished the media deprivation challenge. I did not use cell phone, TV, and Internet for a day. No TV is ok with me because I don’t watch TV a lot, but no cell phone and no internet was giving me a hard time. I started the challenge on Sunday, right after I finished all my homework and my exam, because those things really need the Internet to be done.At first I felt kind of weird because I used to connect with my friend by phone or Facebook. For example, I wanted to ask some of my friends to go out to eat, then I had to drive to their houses, knock their doors to ask them out for dinner. It would be much faster if I could use my phone. However, it was fun that I had a chance to see how my friends’ life are going on. We were not used to come home each other for a long time, calling each other to make appointment were a ll we did.In my opinion, technology is great for every one, because make people connect to each other and know information faster and easier. Nowadays, people are familiar with online news, watching news on TV, and connecting to each other by Internet or cell phone. I think that is a great way save time and money. We don’t need to buy newspaper every morning and read, we just only need too open the web browser or turn on the morning news in TV to know all the information that we need for a day.

A contrast between Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' and the film Essay

A contrast between Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' and the film version directed by Franco Zeffirelli 1968 - Essay Example In the play, Romeo is in the process of recovering after being jilted by Rosaline (Act 1, Scene 1, Line 155). A rejected lover’s instinctive reaction is to find another love as soon as possible, and Romeo does this, becoming amorously involved with Juliet. The movie however does not depict or refer to Rosaline at all, thereby not laying the foundation as to why Romeo became involved with Juliet. The second difference is discernable in the portrayal of the lovers’ mood during the marriage scene. In the play, Romeo and Juliet are both in a serious mood, which is reflected by the way they speak (in Act II, Scene 6, Line 6 Romeo remarks that the Friar’s holy words were solemn enough to join his hand with Juliet’s in marriage. In the same scene {Lines 33/34 (http://www.tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/romeo_juliet/full.html)}, Juliet declares that her love for Romeo has grown so much that she is not able to estimate even half of its rich value). In Zeffirelli’s movie the marriage scene is frivolous, with Romeo and Juliet shown kissing, cuddling and giggling all through it. The third difference is apparent in Juliet’s chamber during her funeral scene. In the play, although the Friar knows that Juliet is in fact not dead, still he maintains a deadpan expression throughout the funeral scene, properly condoling the Capulet family, telling them to dry their tears and prepare to bring Juliet’s body to the church for the last rites to be dispensed (Act IV, Scene 5, Lines 68-86 {http://www.tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/ romeo_juliet/full.html}). In the movie, the Friar almost lets out the secret that Juliet is not dead by being unable to control a giggle; luckily none of the mourners notices what would seem to them a strange act on the part of the holy man (Zeffirelli, Franco. â€Å"Romeo and Juliet {1968}).† The last difference lies in the final scene when the real funerals of Romeo and Juliet take place. In the play, the Montague and Capulet families bury

Constructivism in Architecture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Constructivism in Architecture - Essay Example In other words, Conrads (1975) set a different criterion for the appearance of constructivism; according to the above researcher, constructivism was not established for responding to specific political needs, as related to the change in Russia’s political system in 1920s, but rather to promote particular architectural rules and principles, which were considered as valuable according to the creators of the Realist Manifesto. The rules of constructivism, as incorporated within the above paper, seem to promote specific ideas: simplicity in regard to lines and decorative elements and avoidance of excessive decoration (Conrads 1975). Additional elements have been incorporate in constructivism during the development of the concept through the decades, meaning especially the constructivism as used in the architecture. The literature developed in regard to constructivism seems to lead to a contradictory result, at least at a first level: constructivism is presented as an architectural trend, which was mostly used for interpreting social trends. However, a careful review of the views developed in this field opposes this view: it is clear that constructivism, in its original form, is involved mostly in the development of works of art, including architectural designs. When being used for interpreting social or political trends, constructivism has been modified, being radically different from its initial form. Thus, it can be stated that the rules of constructivism used for explaining social or political trends are highly differentiated from the initial rules of the particular concept; constructivism as related to the society and politics is, in practice, a different framework from that used in architecture; in this way, it cannot be claimed that... From the report it is clear that the literature developed in regard to constructivism seems to lead to a contradictory result, at least at a first level: constructivism is presented as an architectural trend, which was mostly used for interpreting social trends. However, a careful review of the views developed in this field opposes this view: it is clear that constructivism, in its original form, is involved mostly in the development of works of art, including architectural designs. When being used for interpreting social or political trends, constructivism has been modified, being radically different from its initial form. As the paper declares the rules of constructivism used for explaining social or political trends are highly differentiated from the initial rules of the particular concept; constructivism as related to the society and politics is, in practice, a different framework from that used in architecture; in this way, it cannot be claimed that constructivism, as an architectural concept, has been mostly related to society and politics. It has been always remained related only to architecture. Constructivists used the particular concept for reflecting the influence of industrialization on social life and art. The establishment of the concept that could relate the rules and the trends of industrialization with architectural design has been unavoidable. The use of constructivism for supporting specific political projects cannot justify the direct relationship between constructivism and society.

British Petroleum Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

British Petroleum - Case Study Example Colonialism, however, eventually collapsed but BP did not (Heiss, 1997). Indeed, not only did BP survive the collapse of colonialism but it expanded its global operations, effectively maintained its status as one of the world's top oil and gas multinationals. In recent years, however, BP's status was threatened by industrial accidents which, consequent to their detrimental environmental effects, turned public opinion against the company. Survival, evidenced in the fact that it did re-bounce, was predicated on the successful revamping of BP's image. With the dawn of the new millennium, British Petroleum's problems reached the point of crisis. Its environmental and human rights records were placed in the spotlight and subjected to public scrutiny, with the outcome being that in both 2001 and 2006, BP was named as one of the world's worst corporations (Cameron, 2006). Allegations, the majority of which were substantiated and incontrovertibly factual, encompassed of BP's poor environmental record, its abuse of its own employees, its support of totalitarian governments for its own financial gain and the exploitation of the public's dependency on oil and gas for the expansion of its profit margins. Accusations pertaining to abuse of its labour force focus on the Tex... gh price in 2005 when a large column overfilled with gas, leading to the formation of a vapour cloud and, eventually, an explosion which killed 15 employees, injured several others and destroyed a significant percentage of the plant itself. More independent and internal investigations placed the blame squarely on BP, focusing on mismanagement and lack of regard for worker and environmental safety as evidence in its failure to maintain the plant and implement the minimum required safety standards (Cameron, 2006). Prior to recovering from the Texas City Refinery Disaster, BP confronted an environmental disaster in Prudhoe bay, Alaska, fording the closure of its pipelines there. In 2006, corrosion in its pipeline led to the spilling of 5,000 barrels of oil into the environment (Cameron, 2006). At this point, part of, but not all of the pipeline was closed. In 2007, a second disaster forced the closure of much of the remaining operational sections of the pipeline. Again, the cause was cited as BP's failure to adequately invest in safety and maintenance. It is interesting to note that in 2006 BP admitted to the fact that it had contributed to the degradation of the Alaskan natural environment through seepages which totaled approximately 27,000 barrels of oil (BP,' n.d.). The fallout of BP's seemingly callous attitude towards worker safety and the environment, were only exacerbated by its support of totalitarian and abusive governments for the purpose of maintaining corporate profits. In 2006, BP lost a lawsuit launched against it by Columbian farmers who accused the company of supporting an openly abusive regime for the purpose of maintaining its pipeline operations in the country. A similar accusation was made by the West Papua population which accused BP of